Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Jerry Verlinger's column >>

JERRY VERLINGER

Home Page
Trying to get in the middle of everything!
Articles Posted: 133  Links Seeded: 2591
Member Since: 2/2008  Last Seen: 5/19/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Teen Atheist Wins: School District Won't Appeal Ruling to Remove Prayer Mural

Seeded on Fri Feb 17, 2012 8:19 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: The Blaze
religion, aclu, rhode-island, american-civil-liberties-union, cbs-news, religious-liberty, american-humanist-association, jessica-ahlquist, cranston-high-school, cranston-school-committee, controversial-prayer-mural, judge-s-mandate, rhode-island-chapter, teen-atheist, west-in-cranston
Seeded by Jerry Verlinger
Advertise | AdChoices

A massive crowd gathered at Cranston High School West in Cranston, Rhode Island, to discuss the future of a controversial prayer mural that has captured headlines for months. 

While many came to protest a court ruling that found the banner to be unconstitutional, others praised the teen atheist who fought its presence. Last night’s meeting, which CBS News likened, at least at its start, to “a rabid shout fest,” ended with the Cranston School Committee voting 5-2 not an appeal the judge’s mandate that the mural be taken down.

The district’s reasoning for not pursuing the case, it seems, has more to do with money than it does a disregard for religious liberty. We’ve reported about the extensive expenses associated with the case. Already, the battle has cost taxpayers $173,000 — and this was merely for the monies needed to defend against the lawsuit Ahlquist launched with the Rhode Island chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

According to the school committee, the total cost if the district launched an appeal and it reached the Supreme Court could have come in at $500,000. Read more;

Afghanistan 

 

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Jerry Verlinger's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Activism, American_Politics, Arise, American Socialists, Bar Room Debates, Centervine, Constitutional Law, Education of America, EthicsVine, Extreme Liberal Democrats, Free Thinkers, Government & Industry, Grey Boomers, Unite!, Gut Check America, Hall of Mirrors, Hate Watch, Heated Debate, Human Rights Vine, It's the Law!, Left of Center, Libertarians, Logic on the Vine, Mad As Hell!! Aren't You??, Media Outrage, NeoConservative Watch, Newsvine HONOR Vine, No re-regs allowed, Open Mic, Open Minded, Power to The People!, Question Authority, RantVine, Rational Progressive Party, rationalists, Republican Progressives, Respectful Debate, Restore America's Compassion, Seeders and Posters w/ Manners, Successful Solutions, The Great American ReEducation, The Truth Network, Theocratic Life, WTF?
  • Regions: Providence/New Bedford
  • Public Discussion (11)
  • No re-regs allowed (1)
Jerry Verlinger

There is nothing wrong with the text of the "prayer", if they eliminated the "Our Heavenly Father", the "Amen" and changed the Cranston School Prayer to the Cranston School Oath ot Motto, the "prayer" would still be there, but it wouldn't be prayer.

    Reply#1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:14 PM EST
    JVSimp

    Which if what she asked the school to do, when they said no she went with a lawsuit.

    • 3 votes
    #1.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:27 PM EST
    thelopes

    There is nothing wrong with the text of the "prayer", if they eliminated the...

    The things wrong with the text are the items you just said could've been eliminated to fix it.

    • 3 votes
    #1.2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:34 PM EST
    Jerry Verlinger

    The things wrong with the text are the items you just said could've been eliminated to fix it.

    When I said "text",. I was actually referring t the "body" of the prayer.

    The school should have known that to post a banner with the terms "Prayer", "Heavenly Father" and "Amen", would only serve to raise questions regarding Church/State issues.

    This is just another example of Atheist showing no tolerance for religion, and those with religious beliefs having no tolerance for Atheist.

    Personally, I have no tolerance for intolerance.

      #1.3 - Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:32 AM EST
      ScreamingForVengeance

      Personally, I have no tolerance for intolerance.

      Now thats some awesome @!$%# you said right there and it sums it up perfectly.

      Personally, I am a Christian. A pretty bad one perhaps, but one none-the-less. Jesus is The Man for me! However, my Faith is personal and i'm aware of that. I am also aware that there are many who do not my share my faith. And i'm okay with that. That is their absolute right for a multitude of reasons.

      So I will always respect that. However, I should also have the right to display symbols of my faith without having to worry about somebody...well, being petty as @!$%#. And everybody here knows what i'm talking about.

      Having no faith is your right and I wish you luck with that one when your Final Day comes. But your lack of faith doesn't mean you have the right to say our faith can't be displayed because it offends you.

      Like people not saying "Merry Christmas" because it might offend somebody.

      @!$%# you with that bull@!$%#. Hey @!$%#s, CHRISTmas. Get it? CHRISTmas. It's not a Happy Holiday. It's MERRY CHRISTMAS. I'll bet not a single one of you Atheist's turn down CHRISTmas GIFTS when they come your way. I'll bet you grin and say "Thank You and Merry Christmas to you too"!

      Happy Holidays. Happy Holidays up your ass! Man, this @!$%# burns my ass sometimes. And I understand the Hard Core Christians are just as bad in their...bull@!$%#. But what I see happening is a total attack on pretty much any and all Faiths by those who choose to be Faithless.

      There has to be a Middle Ground and a Tolerance for each other here. By both sides.

      Period.

      • 3 votes
      #1.4 - Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:12 AM EST
      thelopes

      This is just another example of Atheist showing no tolerance for religion,

      I have to disagree with you there.

      Nobody is outlawing churches, nobody is silencing the ability for private citizens to practice or believe in their faith.

      And nowhere is she trying to replace the banner with anything representing her mindset - she was looking for a neutral state.

      • 2 votes
      #1.5 - Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:44 PM EST
      ScreamingForVengeance

      I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you.

      A "Neutral State" for an Atheist in this day and age means the total elimination of every Religious symbol they have to see.

      Let them tell it, they'll melt if they have to see a Cross or possibly hear other people pray. Their poor sensitivity and all that. It's all bull@!$%# man. Their simply making waves because they can....because they have nothing better to do with their time.

      All I can say is, to each their own......

      • 2 votes
      #1.6 - Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:43 AM EST
      thelopes

      A "Neutral State" for an Atheist in this day and age means the total elimination of every Religious symbol they have to see.

      Do you have examples of an atheist pushing for a removal of the first amendment somewhere?

      In my experience, atheists tend to want a secular state, where only the government stays out of the question, but the people are free to choose to believe as they want, build churches, etc, as citizens.

      • 2 votes
      #1.7 - Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:24 AM EST
      JackOL-1666973

      There is nothing wrong with the text of the "prayer", if they eliminated the "Our Heavenly Father", the "Amen" and changed the Cranston School Prayer to the Cranston School Oath ot Motto, the "prayer" would still be there, but it wouldn't be prayer.

      I have to disagree. The text of the prayer is listed below -

      School Prayer

      Our Heavenly Father,

      Grant us each day the desire to do our best. To grow mentally and morally as well as physically. To be kind and helpful to our classmates and teachers. To be honest with ourselves as well as with others. Help us to be good sports and smile when we lose as well as when we win. Teach us the value of true friendship. Help us always to conduct ourselves so as to bring credit to Cranston High School West.

      Even if they modified the "School Prayer" title, the body of the prayer is obviously a prayer. As you stated, 'the "prayer" would still be there.' The words "Grant us," "Help us," and "Teach us" are clearly words one uses to beseech god.

      Also, U.S. District Court Judge Ronald Lagueux stated in his ruling -

      "The purpose of the prayer banner was clearly religious in nature," and that "No amount of debate can make the school Prayer anything other than a prayer, and a Christian one at that."

      Now,

      The school should have known that to post a banner with the terms "Prayer", "Heavenly Father" and "Amen", would only serve to raise questions regarding Church/State issues.

      Agreed, wholeheartedly. They should have removed it immediately once the complaint was filed by the ACLU on behalf of a unnamed parent. It would seem they thought the Christian religion was entitled to special treatment.

      http://www.riaclu.org/documents/CranstonschoolprayerdisplayletterJuly62010.pdf

      I would maintain the body of the prayer is still a prayer and would have to be significantly rewritten to be an oath or a motto. See above Judge Lagueux remarks.

      This is just another example of Atheist showing no tolerance for religion,

      I don't see how you can justify this statement. Atheism, per se, has tolerance for religion. However, religious doctrine must be kept out of government and public buildings (separation of church and state). No religion can be endorsed by the government or public agency. That is the heart of the Establishment Clause which you seemingly fail to understand or appreciate.

      and those with religious beliefs having no tolerance for Atheist.

      I'm sure there are exceptions, but this is what we've seen time and time again. This poor girl couldn't even get a local florist to deliver flowers to her. Jessica, currently a junior at the HS, will be harassed by bullies Christians for the remainder of her HS days.

      Personally, I have no tolerance for intolerance.

      A perplexing statement given your apparent intolerance towards atheists, secular government and our constitutional freedoms.

      • 2 votes
      #1.8 - Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:35 AM EST
      ScreamingForVengeance

      No, not off the top of my head. But I know I've seen and heard a good dozen or so cases over the past year where there was an issue because of either a Prayer or the 10 Commandments being displayed in a Public Venue.

      It's just...I don't know. I simply think and feel that the petty intolerance or lack of acceptance has gone to far. To much Political Correctness.

      But whatever. In the end, I don't need Statues or Plaques to have my Faith. To my way of thinking and my Faith, those who are non-believers will one day pay a very high price for their beliefs. Or lack of. I wish people would see the light, but in the end, that is a personal choice that only they can make.

      I wish them the best of luck with that.....

      • 2 votes
      #1.9 - Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:20 PM EST
      thelopes

      No, not off the top of my head. But I know I've seen and heard a good dozen or so cases over the past year where there was an issue because of either a Prayer or the 10 Commandments being displayed in a Public Venue.

      It's hard to answer vague references, but let me venture a guess or two.

      Was it a Christmas scene? Those tend to be solved when the local government allows all options to display their desired messages and not play favoritism.

      On a 10 commandments - was it on the venue of a court or a capitol building? Those really aren't "displays on a Public Vendue" - those would be monuments connected to the local government.

      • 2 votes
      #1.10 - Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:56 PM EST
      Reply
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse |
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com