Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Jerry Verlinger's column >>

JERRY VERLINGER

Home Page
Trying to get in the middle of everything!
Articles Posted: 133  Links Seeded: 2591
Member Since: 2/2008  Last Seen: 5/19/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Prop 8, California's Same-Sex Marriage Ban, Declared Unconstitutional

Seeded on Tue Feb 7, 2012 6:43 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: The Huffington Post
us-news, video, gay-marriage, gay-rights, prop-8, marriage-equality, proposition-8, gay-voices-news, prop-8-overturned
Seeded by Jerry Verlinger
Advertise | AdChoices

A federal appeals court on Tuesday declared California's same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional but agreed to give sponsors of the bitterly contested, voter-approved law time to appeal the ruling before ordering the state to resume allowing gay couples to wed.

The three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that a lower court judge correctly interpreted the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court precedents when he declared in 2010 that Proposition 8 – a response to an earlier state court decision that legalized gay marriage – was a violation of the civil rights of gays and lesbians. Read more;

 

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Jerry Verlinger's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: 112th United States Congress, Activism, American_Politics, Arise, American Socialists, Bar Room Debates, Centervine, Constitutional Law, Education of America, EthicsVine, Extreme Liberal Democrats, Free Thinkers, Get On Your Soapbox, Gut Check America, Heated Debate, Historical Vine, Human Rights Vine, It's the Law!, Law Vine, Left of Center, Libertarians, Logic on the Vine, Newsvine HONOR Vine, Newsvine's Gay Mafia, No re-regs allowed, Open Mic, Open Minded, Power to The People!, Progressive Democrats, RantVine, Rational Progressive Party, rationalists, Respectful Debate, Restore America's Compassion, Seeders and Posters w/ Manners, Successful Solutions, The Great American ReEducation, The Truth Network, V.O.I.C.E. in America
  • Regions: San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose
  • Public Discussion (7)
  • No re-regs allowed (3)
Jerry Verlinger

One legal analyst said the U.S. Supreme Court might not agree to take up the case on appeal because the appeals court focused its decision exclusively on California's ban.

"The ruling is on the narrowest ground possible," said University of Santa Clara constitutional law professor Margaret Russell.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 6:45 PM EST
Shelby Davenport

Just like I've said on the other seeds - I love California!

Of course, they'll just condemn the Ninth Circuit to being full of "activist judges." Fact is, it's an Equal Protection issue that just can't be disputed.

New figures out - 18 to 35 years, over 70% agree that same sex marriage should be legal.

36 to 54 years - 56% agree that same sex marriage should be legal.

Over 55 - 35% agree.

So, this WILL go away, it's just a matter of time. Small consolation for those who want to be equal TODAY.

  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 6:50 PM EST
BLOGER-486140

It was a good ruling and very narrow. It applies only to the situation in California where rights were extended by legislation but rescinded by a proposition. A majority should never be allowed to rescind a person's rights by majority vote alone. The major role of the government is to protect a minority from the whims of a majority. If people are against gay marriage work through the legislative process to repeal it.

A fine decision.

  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 7:54 PM EST
Kara Shalee

Very happy to hear of this. I was talking to one of my gay friends just a few hours ago on this matter, and I have encouraged her to marry her partner of 10 years ASAP. She didn't understand the difference. Said they were domestic partners. I had to explain to her that wasn't good enough, that she has more protection in marriage. It is a human right.

Thanks for the seed, Jerry..........

All the Best,

Kara

    Reply#4 - Thu Feb 9, 2012 5:55 AM EST
    Jerry Verlinger

    Your welcome kara, thanks for stopping by.

    The way I look at it is, Federal District Court decisions are occasionally overturned, and sometimes different districts hand down conflicting rulings on the same issue. An important issue like this should go to the SCOTUS, because the gays need an absolute definitive decision.

    I am confident they will uphold the Fed Court ruling, because IMO any ban or restriction regarding gay marriage is unconstitutional.

    We need to unconditionally allow married gays to move from State to State without being concerned that their marriage is not recognized in one State or another.

    • 2 votes
    #4.1 - Thu Feb 9, 2012 4:19 PM EST
    Kara Shalee

    We need to unconditionally allow married gays to move from State to State without being concerned that their marriage is not recognized in one State or another

    Absolutely!!

      #4.2 - Thu Feb 9, 2012 8:14 PM EST
      Reply
      The_Messenger

      Judges need to realize that they don't make the Constitution, the people do! They(the judges) need to keep their noses out of laws made by the direct vote of the people. If they don't then they just may find themselves back out on the streets looking for jobs themselves.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#5 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 6:20 PM EST
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse |
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com